对谷歌 Pixel 10 Pro 的评价谷歌 Pixel 10 Pro 是一款高品质的紧凑型旗舰智能手机，配备大猩猩玻璃 Victus 2、铝合金边框和 IP68 认证。功能全面，但并非完美无瑕。虽然这款智能手机符合当前的标准，如蓝牙 6.0、UWB、NFC、Wi-Fi 7 和新的 "Pixelsnap "磁铁，但 USB 端口对文件系统仍然有限，存储选项有时也不一致--即使在更昂贵的机型上也缺少 UFS 4.0。
在软件和 AI 功能方面，Pixel 10 Pro 尤为强大。 Android 16 配备了七年更新、双子座功能和实时翻译。不过，后者似乎仍不成熟，经常提供不正确的结果。
Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG
Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG
显示屏的高亮度和良好的色彩还原给人留下了深刻印象，但存在 PWM 闪烁的问题，尽管有 480 Hz 的选项，但对于敏感的用户来说，这并不能起到任何缓解作用。在性能方面，Tensor G5 落后于竞争对手。日常运行非常流畅，但基准测试和游戏测试却显示出明显的不足。尤其是游戏玩家，不得不忍受帧率下降和缺乏光线追踪功能的问题。
相机功能多样，整体效果非常出色，但在细节、动态范围和弱光质量方面达到了极限。人工智能有时工作不稳定，特别是在变焦时，尤其是在拍摄字体或移动物体时。尽管如此，它无疑是智能手机中最好的设置之一。
Pros+ 做工精良
+ 出色的摄像头设置
+ 实用的像素抓拍
+ 电池寿命长
+ IP68 认证
+ 7 年更新Cons- 最低亮度 PWM 频率较低
- 最便宜的版本内存最小
- 旧的 UFS 3.1 内存
- 建筑物内的 GNSS 功能较弱
- 没有双 eSIM 卡
价格和供应情况Pixel 10 Pro 可直接从Google以及MediaMarkt和德国亚马逊等所有主要零售商。
这款智能手机还可在美国亚马逊上购买，售价 1099 美元。
$788.59Google Pixel 10 Pro - Unlocked Android Smartphone with Gemini, Your Google AI Assistant, Triple Rear Camera System, Fast-Charging 24+ Hour Battery, and 6.3" Super Actua Display - Jade - 256 GB
Table of Contents对谷歌 Pixel 10 Pro 的评价规格谷歌 Pixel 10 Pro构建：Pixel 10 Pro 有四种颜色功能特点新增 Pixelsnap软件：Pixel 10 Pro 的七年更新通信和全球导航卫星系统：Wi-Fi 7 和双频全球导航卫星系统手机功能和语音质量配备双卡双待的 Pixel 10 Pro摄像头Pixel 10 Pro 强大的三摄像头配件和保修：Pixel Care+ 仅在美国输入设备和操作：Pixel 手机中的超声波指纹识别器显示屏Pixel 10 Pro 采用明亮的 LTPO OLED 显示屏性能张量 G5 落后于竞争对手游戏快速出汗排放物 - 配备 Auracast 的 Pixel 手机电池寿命：谷歌 Pixel 10 Pro 电池容量为 4,870 毫安时Notebookcheck 对谷歌 Pixel 10 Pro 的总体印象潜在竞争对手比较
4 Reviews ← exclude selected types ← exclude selected tags
谷歌 Pixel 10 Pro 是继 像素 9 Pro在性能、连接性和人工智能功能等方面进行了改进。显示屏的 PWM 频率可选择性地提高了一倍，在电池充电方面也有创新。
Pixel 10 Pro 有四种存储配置可供选择：128 GB（1099 欧元）、256 GB（1199 欧元）、512 GB（1329 欧元）和 1 TB（1589 欧元）。不过，并非所有存储选项都有所有颜色版本。
规格谷歌 Pixel 10 Pro
Google Pixel 10 Pro (Pixel 10 Series)ProcessorGoogle Tensor G5 8c/8t, 1 x 3.8 GHz ARM Cortex-X4, 5 x 3.1 GHz ARM Cortex-A725, 2 x 2.3 GHz ARM Cortex-A520, LagunaGraphics adapterIMG DXT-48-1536Memory16 GB , LPDDR5xDisplay6.30 inch 20:9, 2856 x 1280 pixel 497 PPI, Capacitive touchscreen, OLED, LTPO (1 - 120 Hz), Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2, glossy: yes, 120 HzStorage256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash, 256 GB , 232 GB freeConnections1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer, thermometer, OTG, UWB, Thread, Titan M2Networking802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 6.0, 2G (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), 3G (Band 1, 2, 4, 5, 8), LTE (Band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66, 71, 75), 5G-Sub6 (Band 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 26, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 66, 71, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79), NB-IoT (Band 23, 255, 256), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPSSizeheight x width x depth (in mm): 8.6 x 152.8 x 72Battery4870 mAh Lithium-PolymerChargingwireless charging, fast charging / QuickchargeOperating SystemAndroid 16CameraPrimary Camera: 50 MPix (f/1.68, 24 mm, 1/1.3", OIS) + 48 MPix (5x optical zoom, f/2.8, 110 mm, 1/2.55", OIS) + 48 MPix (Ultra Wide / Macro, f/1.7, 12mm, 1/2.55"); Camera2-API-Level: FullSecondary Camera: 42 MPix (f/2.2, 17 mm, AF)Additional featuresSpeakers: Dual, Keyboard: OnScreen, USB-C-Cabel, SIM-Tool, 24 Months Warranty, Bluetooth Audio Codecs: SBC, AAC, aptX, aptX HD, LDAC | Auracast | GNSS: GPS (L1, L5), Glonass (L1), BeiDou (B1I, B1C, B2a), Galileo (E1, E5a), QZSS (L1, L5), NavIC (L5) | HDR: HLG, HDR10, HDR10+ | DRM Widevine L1 | eSIM | IP68 | USB Copy Test: 221.57 MB/s (connected to Samsung Portable SSD T7), Supported File Systems for external storages: FAT32, exFAT | Body-SAR: 1.39 W/kg, Head-SAR: 0.99 W/kg | max. charging speed: 30 W (wired) / 15 W (wireless), fanless, waterproofWeight207 g
Price1199 EuroAmazon$788.59LinksGoogle homepageNote: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.see all specifications
构建：Pixel 10 Pro 有四种颜色谷歌 Pixel 10 Pro 有月光石、瓷器、黑曜石和翡翠（我们的测试设备）四种颜色可供选择。这款智能手机的名义厚度为 8.6 毫米（我们测量的厚度为 8.25 毫米），加上摄像头驼峰后厚度为 11.9 毫米。正面和背面均由康宁大猩猩玻璃 Victus 2 制成，而边框则由高度抛光的铝合金制成。
Pixel 10 Pro 的做工非常精良，仅在后玻璃和边框之间的缝隙中显示出极小的不规则。它可以承受扭转尝试，并发出轻微的脆响。这款谷歌智能手机通过了 IP68 认证，因此具有防尘和防水功能。
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
ⓘ Daniel Schmidtⓘ Daniel Schmidt
尺寸比较
Honor Magic7 Pro Google Pixel 10 Pro Xiaomi 15 Apple iPhone 16 Pro Samsung Galaxy S25 DIN A6 ❌
功能特点新增 PixelsnapPixel 10 Pro 提供 128、256、512 或 1,024 GB 存储容量，不支持 microSD 卡。不过，并非所有存储版本都有所有颜色可供选择。我们还发现 128 GB 版本对于高端智能手机来说太小了。
谷歌已将蓝牙升级到 6.0 版本。其他功能与前代产品非常相似：NFC、UWB 和红外测温仪再次出现。
不过，新功能是 Pixelsnap。它类似于Apple 的 MagSafe，背面有一组磁铁，可以用来锁定配件和充电器。顺便提一下，在测试中，Pixel 10 Pro 与 MagSafe 充电面配合得非常完美。
USB 端口根据 3.2 标准（第一代）工作，并与 三星便携式固态硬盘 T7可实现不错的传输速率（221.57 MB/s）。不过，它只支持 FAT32 和 exFAT 文件系统，甚至无法读取 NTFS。
也可以进行有线图像输出，但只能镜像屏幕。
顶部：SIM 卡托盘、麦克风
左侧
右侧功率、音量
底部扬声器、USB 3.2 端口、麦克风软件：Pixel 10 Pro 的七年更新谷歌 Pixel 10 Pro 随Android 16 提供，并将在未来七年内（从该设备在美国谷歌商店首次上市起）获得更新。
其亮点是众多人工智能功能，如双子座、双子座纳米、双子座实时、Circle to Search、改进的实时翻译和图像编辑功能。此外，还包括谷歌自己的免费 VPN。
可持续性在可持续发展报告中，谷歌对 Pixel 10 Pro 进行了全面介绍，并提供了二氧化碳排放量和可回收材料比例的具体数据。外包装不含塑料。
根据iFixit、有经验的用户可以根据说明书和智能手机备件自行维修 Pixel 10 Pro。不过，在撰写本文时，这些资料尚未提供。
通信和全球导航卫星系统：Wi-Fi 7 和双频全球导航卫星系统在城市环境中，谷歌 Pixel 10 Pro 的手机接收效果很好，无可挑剔。频率覆盖堪称典范，因此在全球范围内都不会出现连接问题。
Wi-Fi 7 支持三个频段。结合我们的华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 参考路由器，谷歌智能手机实现了较高且基本稳定的传输速率。
NetworkingGoogle Pixel 10 Pro802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be iperf3 transmit AXE11000
928 (min: 844) MBit/s ∼88%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
916 (min: 903) MBit/s ∼78%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1571 MBit/s ∼83%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1742 (min: 1566) MBit/s ∼97%
Samsung Galaxy S25Wi-Fi 7 iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1058 (min: 518) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1167 (min: 1006) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1210 (min: 998) MBit/s ∼64%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1201 (min: 1184) MBit/s ∼67%
Apple iPhone 16 ProWi-Fi 7 iperf3 transmit AXE11000
622 (min: 487) MBit/s ∼59%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
921 (min: 876) MBit/s ∼79%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
969 (min: 436) MBit/s ∼51%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1387 (min: 1360) MBit/s ∼77%
Xiaomi 15Wi-Fi 7 iperf3 transmit AXE11000
876 (min: 445) MBit/s ∼83%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
871 (min: 785) MBit/s ∼75%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1386 (min: 628) MBit/s ∼74%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1793 (min: 1671) MBit/s ∼100%
Honor Magic7 ProWi-Fi 7 iperf3 transmit AXE11000
981 (min: 886) MBit/s ∼93%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
829 (min: 758) MBit/s ∼71%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1884 (min: 928) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1569 (min: 1486) MBit/s ∼88%
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be iperf3 transmit AXE11000
956 (min: 595) MBit/s ∼90%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1046 (min: 459) MBit/s ∼90%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1278 (min: 508) MBit/s ∼68%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1501 (min: 719) MBit/s ∼84%
Average of class Smartphone iperf3 transmit AXE11000
692 (min: 52.5) MBit/s ∼65%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
740 (min: 52.2) MBit/s ∼63%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1257 (min: 287) MBit/s ∼67%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1398 (min: 339) MBit/s ∼78%
Google Pixel 10 Pro 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz: Ø1543 (485-1715) MBit/sXiaomi 15 Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1365 (628-1900) MBit/sGoogle Pixel 10 Pro 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1741 (1566-1859) MBit/sXiaomi 15 Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1791 (1671-1841) MBit/sGoogle Pixel 10 Pro 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø928 (844-962) MBit/sXiaomi 15 Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø861 (445-968) MBit/sGoogle Pixel 10 Pro 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø915 (903-923) MBit/sXiaomi 15 Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø869 (785-951) MBit/s
室外
楼内Pixel 10 Pro 使用双频 GNSS 进行定位，支持所有全球卫星系统。卫星定位在室内需要较长的时间，而且不是特别准确。而室外接收则非常快速和准确。
我们将谷歌手机与 Garmin Venu 2健身智能手表进行了比较。Pixel 10 Pro 的准确度稍低，偶尔会有点偏离路径，但这不应该成为导航任务的限制因素。
全球导航卫星系统试车：环湖航行
全球导航卫星系统试运行：城市
全球导航卫星系统试运行：总结手机功能和语音质量配备双卡双待的 Pixel 10 Pro
当把谷歌 Pixel 10 Pro 放在耳边时，它的语音质量非常好。只要周围环境不太嘈杂，声音就能自然清晰地传达出来。不过，如果确实如此，Pixel 用户的声音听起来会比较闷，有时甚至难以理解。
当然，VoLTE 和 Wi-Fi 通话也在其中。这款智能手机可以使用 nano-SIM。eSIM 卡可以作为替代或补充，但遗憾的是不支持双实体 SIM 卡。
Pixel 智能手机还可以在通话过程中实时翻译通话内容。不过，这必须首先在手机应用设置中激活。这并不需要在线连接，因为所需的 1.55 GB 数据必须提前下载到手机中。
遗憾的是，到目前为止只有少数几种语言可用，而且翻译经常不准确或错误。脏话经常被忽略或被简单地翻译成正面的内容。扬声器的声音也可用于翻译，这一点我们很喜欢。
另一个新功能是可以发送音频表情符号，然后将其转换成声音。
摄像头Pixel 10 Pro 强大的三摄像头与谷歌 Pixel 10 Pro 自拍前置 4200 万像素自动对焦镜头用作自拍摄像头。它采用像素分档技术，因此拍摄出来的照片大小约为 10MP，但在弱光环境下效果也不错。自拍摄像头的质量令人印象深刻，能拍摄出均衡的照片。视频以 4K 超高清格式录制，最高每秒 60 帧，而想要使用 10 位 HDR 的用户则只能以每秒 30 帧的速度拍摄。
主摄像头有三个镜头，其中主镜头和长焦镜头配备了光学防抖（OIS）功能。超广角镜头还可用作微距镜头。Pixel 10 Pro 的成像性能非常出色，均衡的图像构图和自然的色彩给人留下了深刻印象。不过，有时图像的深度会缺乏细节和活力，这让人不太满意。 一加 13在湖泊场景中表现更好。在弱光环境下，景物的光线平衡很成功，但这是以牺牲部分细节为代价的，而且图像也会变得相当明亮。
超广角镜头的情况与此类似，它能很好地呈现深度，但同样牺牲了细节。外围区域也存在畸变。变焦时，Pixel 10 Pro 表现强劲，即使在 10 倍数码变焦时也能获得良好的效果。从 30 倍放大率开始，Pro Resolution Zoom（专业分辨率变焦）将被激活，它使用人工智能来分析和改进图像，类似于我们已经在 Honor Magic7 Pro或 魔术 V5.只要图像中没有生物，效果就会相当不错，因为在这种情况下很快就会出现错误。人工智能在处理文字时也会出现问题。专业分辨率数码变焦最高可达 100 倍。
另一项新功能是 "相机教练"，旨在通过逐步指导，帮助您寻找新照片的灵感，并将所选主题发挥到极致。
使用视频增强功能可录制最高 8K 30 fps 的视频。所有镜头均可使用 10 位 HDR，最高可达 4k 30 fps。一般来说，用户可以在 24、30 和 60 fps 模式之间进行选择。拍摄时，在摄像机之间切换非常方便。
Image comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
HauptkameraHauptkameraUltraweitwinkel5-facher ZoomLow-Lightclick to load imagesGoogle Pixel 10 ProOnePlus 13 realme GT 7Canon EOS 90D0.2x2 MPixel4 Mpixel1xclick to load imagesGoogle Pixel 10 ProOnePlus 13 realme GT 7Canon EOS 90D0.2x2 MPixel4 Mpixel1xclick to load imagesGoogle Pixel 10 ProOnePlus 13 realme GT 7Canon EOS 90D0.2x2 MPixel4 Mpixel1xclick to load imagesGoogle Pixel 10 ProOnePlus 13 realme GT 7Canon EOS 90D0.2x2 MPixel4 Mpixel1xclick to load imagesGoogle Pixel 10 ProOnePlus 13 realme GT 7Canon EOS 90D0.2x2 MPixel4 Mpixel1x
谷歌 Pixel 10 Pro 在可控光线条件下显示出良好的成像性能。虽然我们的测试图表颜色较暗，但也能捕捉到很好的细节，即使在外围区域也能保持相对清晰。
在 ColorChecker 的色彩还原中，谷歌智能手机也没有显示出与 DeltaE 有任何重大偏差。
5.5 ∆E9.6 ∆E4.6 ∆E5.9 ∆E4.4 ∆E8.1 ∆E5.7 ∆E2.8 ∆E8.1 ∆E5.6 ∆E4.9 ∆E4.8 ∆E5 ∆E7.5 ∆E4.7 ∆E4.8 ∆E7.2 ∆E8.6 ∆E7.6 ∆E4.2 ∆E1.7 ∆E4.9 ∆E4.8 ∆E7.5 ∆EColorChecker Google Pixel 10 Pro: 5.78 ∆E min: 1.73 - max: 9.62 ∆E11.7 ∆E16.2 ∆E16.8 ∆E18.6 ∆E18 ∆E24 ∆E15.5 ∆E8.9 ∆E10.7 ∆E11.8 ∆E24.5 ∆E22.9 ∆E9.7 ∆E21.6 ∆E7.9 ∆E17.2 ∆E15 ∆E20.7 ∆E17.3 ∆E15.3 ∆E17.7 ∆E20.1 ∆E19.2 ∆E13.3 ∆EColorChecker Google Pixel 10 Pro: 16.45 ∆E min: 7.86 - max: 24.55 ∆E
Google Pixel 10 ProGoogle Pixel 10 Pro
配件和保修：Pixel Care+ 仅在美国不出所料，Pixel 10 Pro 的供货范围很小，只包括一条 USB-C 数据线和一个 SIM 卡弹出针。
德国提供的保修期为 24 个月，不能延长。Pixel Care+ 保险套餐只针对美国客户。
输入设备和操作：Pixel 手机中的超声波指纹识别器谷歌 Pixel 10 Pro 的电容式触摸屏能够快速、可靠地响应输入。玻璃的滑动性能非常好。显示屏还配备了超声波指纹传感器，识别率高，解锁智能手机快速可靠。
也可通过前置摄像头解锁，但可靠性较差，尤其是在光线不足的情况下。
线性振动电机可提供清晰的触觉反馈，并可在设置中进行相对广泛的调整。按住电源键可启动 Gemini，按两次可打开相机或钱包。
显示屏Pixel 10 Pro 采用明亮的 LTPO OLED 显示屏子像素结构Pixel 10 Pro 配备 6.3 英寸 OLED 显示屏，是一款小巧的智能手机。不过，它的分辨率很高，显示效果也相应清晰。
由于采用了 LTPO 技术，刷新率可由系统在 1 Hz 和 120 Hz 之间动态调节。几乎完全支持 HDR 标准，但不包括杜比视界。
谷歌智能手机的亮度非常高。即使没有激活环境光传感器，在纯白色表面上也能达到 1,405 cd/m² 的亮度。
如果启动传感器，亮度会增加到约 2,200 cd/m²。如果使用减白表面 (APL18)，亮度可达到 3199 cd/m²，播放 HDR 视频时可达到 3207 cd/m²。
2179cd/m²2134cd/m²2259cd/m²2187cd/m²2161cd/m²2259cd/m²2198cd/m²2154cd/m²2255cd/m²
Distribution of brightnesstested with X-Rite i1Pro 3Maximum: 2259 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 2198.4 cd/m² Minimum: 1.71 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 94 %Center on Battery: 2161 cd/m²Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 0.7 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.73}ΔE Greyscale Calman: 0.8 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø4.97}98.1% sRGB (Calman 2D)Gamma: 2.19CCT: 6646 K
Google Pixel 10 ProOLED, 2856x1280, 6.3"Samsung Galaxy S25AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.2"Apple iPhone 16 ProSuper Retina XDR OLED, 2622x1206, 6.3"Xiaomi 15OLED, 2670x1200, 6.4"Honor Magic7 ProOLED, 2800x1280, 6.8"Screen-125%-49%-71%-32%Brightness middle (cd/m²)21611301 -40%1034 -52%1021 -53%1607 -26%Brightness (cd/m²)21981311 -40%1034 -53%1018 -54%1609 -27%Brightness Distribution (%)9498 4%98 4%98 4%95 1%Black Level * (cd/m²)Colorchecker dE 2000 *0.73.1 -343%0.98 -40%1.3 -86%0.9 -29%Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *1.84.4 -144%2.76 -53%2.9 -61%1.8 -0%Greyscale dE 2000 *0.82.3 -187%1.6 -100%2.2 -175%1.7 -113%Gamma2.19 100%2.01 109%2.17 101%2.25 98%2.24 98%CCT6646 98%6454 101%6638 98%6658 98%6346 102%* ... smaller is better
Display: APL18 Peak Brightness | HDR Peak Brightness Display / APL18 Peak Brightness
Google Pixel 10 ProDXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3199 cd/m² Samsung Galaxy S25Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2594 cd/m² -19%Honor Magic7 ProAdreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1634 cd/m² -49%Display / HDR Peak Brightness
Honor Magic7 ProAdreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4697 cd/m² +46%Google Pixel 10 ProDXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3207 cd/m² Samsung Galaxy S25Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2766 cd/m² -14%
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)ℹTo dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.Screen flickering / PWM detected 240 HzAmplitude: 17.24 %The display backlight flickers at 240 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .
The frequency of 240 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.
In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 7804 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.
分钟
25%
50%
75%
100%固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置下的测量系列（最低亮度下的振幅曲线看起来很平，但这是缩放造成的。信息框显示的是最小亮度下的振幅放大图）
480 赫兹功能
激活 480 Hz 功能时的最低亮度 PWM（振幅：14.56）与其他大多数采用 OLED 显示屏的智能手机一样，谷歌 Pixel 10 Pro 也未能幸免 PWM 闪烁。与 Pixel 9 Pro 一样，它的工作频率相对较低，为 240 Hz（见上图）。虽然振幅非常平缓，但敏感用户在长时间使用时仍会出现问题。
在辅助功能设置中可以找到 "为敏感眼睛调整亮度 "选项。我们测量到的 PWM 频率为 480 赫兹。
在最低亮度下，该频率仍然保持在较低的 240 赫兹，只有在显示屏已经非常亮时才会增加到承诺的 480 赫兹。因此，该功能没有任何优势，尤其是在晚上和较暗的环境中。
分钟25%50%75%100%测量系列具有固定变焦级别、激活的 480 Hz 功能和不同的亮度设置
在设置中选择 "自然 "色彩配置文件时，可实现最自然的显示色彩表现。
它提供了最佳的灰度、色彩校验和饱和度扫描值。
灰度（模式：自然，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
ColorChecker （模式：自然，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩空间（模式：自然，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
饱和度扫描（模式：自然，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
Display Response TimesℹDisplay response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times. ↔ Response Time Black to White1.04 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.505 ms rise↘ 0.5395 ms fallThe screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better.This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (19.9 ms). ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey1.31 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.513 ms rise↘ 0.8015 ms fallThe screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 6 % of all devices are better.This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31.1 ms).
Pixel 10 Pro 在户外给人留下了非常好的印象。即使大猩猩玻璃显示屏反光较强，但即使在明亮的阳光下，内容依然清晰易读。
面板的视角稳定性也非常好。即使在非常平的视角下也不会出现色彩反转，只有亮度会明显下降。
户外观赏
视角稳定性性能张量 G5 落后于竞争对手谷歌 Pixel 10 Pro 搭载了自主研发的 张量 G5并可使用相对宽裕的 16 GB 内存。
系统性能非常出色，无可挑剔，但基准测试表明其性能明显落后于大多数竞争对手。
Geekbench 6.6 | Antutu v10 | PCMark for Android | BaseMark OS II | UL Procyon AI Inference for Android | AImark | Geekbench AI | AI Benchmark Geekbench 6.6
Single-CoreApple iPhone 16 ProApple A18 Pro, A18 Pro GPU, 8192
3443 Points +49%Samsung Galaxy S25Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
3087 Points +34%Honor Magic7 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
3050 Points +32%Xiaomi 15Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
3001 Points +30%Google Pixel 10 ProGoogle Tensor G5, DXT-48-1536, 16384
2308 Points Average Google Tensor G5 (2279 - 2319, n=3)
2302 Points 0%Average of class Smartphone (196 - 3883, n=202, last 2 years)
1849 Points -20%Huawei Mate X6HiSilicon Kirin 9020, Maleoon 920, 12288
1586 Points -31% Multi-CoreSamsung Galaxy S25Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
9776 Points +55%Xiaomi 15Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
9202 Points +46%Honor Magic7 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
9019 Points +43%Apple iPhone 16 ProApple A18 Pro, A18 Pro GPU, 8192
8524 Points +35%Google Pixel 10 ProGoogle Tensor G5, DXT-48-1536, 16384
6314 Points Average Google Tensor G5 (5815 - 6314, n=3)
6079 Points -4%Average of class Smartphone (830 - 11811, n=202, last 2 years)
5488 Points -13%Huawei Mate X6HiSilicon Kirin 9020, Maleoon 920, 12288
4938 Points -22%Antutu v10 - Total Score
Xiaomi 15Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
2677100 Points +100%Honor Magic7 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
2474369 Points +85%Samsung Galaxy S25Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
1975467 Points +48%Apple iPhone 16 ProApple A18 Pro, A18 Pro GPU, 8192
1867306 Points +39%Average of class Smartphone (264891 - 3269237, n=111, last 2 years)
1515084 Points +13%Average Google Tensor G5 (1338955 - 1563512, n=3)
1443918 Points +8%Google Pixel 10 ProGoogle Tensor G5, DXT-48-1536, 16384
1338955 Points Huawei Mate X6HiSilicon Kirin 9020, Maleoon 920, 12288
1205616 Points -10%PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Honor Magic7 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
20630 Points +31%Samsung Galaxy S25Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
20623 Points +31%Xiaomi 15Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
19192 Points +22%Average Google Tensor G5 (15738 - 16614, n=3)
16118 Points +2%Google Pixel 10 ProGoogle Tensor G5, DXT-48-1536, 16384
15738 Points Average of class Smartphone (4507 - 28557, n=156, last 2 years)
15185 Points -4%Huawei Mate X6HiSilicon Kirin 9020, Maleoon 920, 12288
14593 Points -7%BaseMark OS II
OverallHonor Magic7 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
13729 Points +63%Samsung Galaxy S25Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
11876 Points +41%Xiaomi 15Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
11031 Points +31%Average Google Tensor G5 (8446 - 9744, n=3)
9138 Points +8%Google Pixel 10 ProGoogle Tensor G5, DXT-48-1536, 16384
8446 Points Huawei Mate X6HiSilicon Kirin 9020, Maleoon 920, 12288
8075 Points -4%Average of class Smartphone (1885 - 16690, n=130, last 2 years)
7950 Points -6%Apple iPhone 16 ProApple A18 Pro, A18 Pro GPU, 8192
Points -100% SystemHonor Magic7 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
19891 Points +54%Samsung Galaxy S25Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
17132 Points +33%Xiaomi 15Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
16439 Points +28%Average Google Tensor G5 (12754 - 14080, n=3)
13238 Points +3%Google Pixel 10 ProGoogle Tensor G5, DXT-48-1536, 16384
12881 Points Huawei Mate X6HiSilicon Kirin 9020, Maleoon 920, 12288
12221 Points -5%Average of class Smartphone (4117 - 21153, n=130, last 2 years)
11547 Points -10% MemoryXiaomi 15Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
16961 Points +134%Honor Magic7 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
15541 Points +114%Samsung Galaxy S25Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
14759 Points +103%Average Google Tensor G5 (7257 - 10594, n=3)
9136 Points +26%Average of class Smartphone (2760 - 24052, n=130, last 2 years)
9069 Points +25%Huawei Mate X6HiSilicon Kirin 9020, Maleoon 920, 12288
8750 Points +21%Google Pixel 10 ProGoogle Tensor G5, DXT-48-1536, 16384
7257 Points GraphicsHonor Magic7 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
51041 Points +70%Xiaomi 15Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
44189 Points +47%Samsung Galaxy S25Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
33965 Points +13%Google Pixel 10 ProGoogle Tensor G5, DXT-48-1536, 16384
30035 Points Average Google Tensor G5 (27761 - 30035, n=3)
29167 Points -3%Average of class Smartphone (1046 - 384996, n=130, last 2 years)
27939 Points -7%Huawei Mate X6HiSilicon Kirin 9020, Maleoon 920, 12288
20494 Points -32% WebSamsung Galaxy S25Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
2275 Points +25%Honor Magic7 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
2252 Points +24%Average Google Tensor G5 (1813 - 2177, n=3)
1996 Points +10%Huawei Mate X6HiSilicon Kirin 9020, Maleoon 920, 12288
1940 Points +7%Google Pixel 10 ProGoogle Tensor G5, DXT-48-1536, 16384
1813 Points Average of class Smartphone (1062 - 2587, n=130, last 2 years)
1738 Points -4%Xiaomi 15Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
1202 Points -34%UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Samsung Galaxy S25Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
21837 Points +24%Average of class Smartphone (3769 - 81594, n=114, last 2 years)
20830 Points +18%Honor Magic7 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
20782 Points +18%Average Google Tensor G5 (17652 - 19584, n=3)
18446 Points +4%Xiaomi 15Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
18154 Points +3%Google Pixel 10 ProGoogle Tensor G5, DXT-48-1536, 16384
17652 Points Huawei Mate X6HiSilicon Kirin 9020, Maleoon 920, 12288
12951 Points -27%AImark - Score v3.x
Apple iPhone 16 ProApple A18 Pro, A18 Pro GPU, 8192
33743 Points +2185%Average of class Smartphone (293 - 307528, n=91, last 2 years)
17970 Points +1117%Huawei Mate X6HiSilicon Kirin 9020, Maleoon 920, 12288
2910 Points +97%Samsung Galaxy S25Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
1893 Points +28%Honor Magic7 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
1796 Points +22%Xiaomi 15Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
1790 Points +21%Google Pixel 10 ProGoogle Tensor G5, DXT-48-1536, 16384
1477 Points Average Google Tensor G5 (1238 - 1477, n=3)
1329 Points -10%Geekbench AI
Single Precision NPU 1.7Average of class Smartphone (80 - 5210, n=111, last 2 years)
668 Points +40%Google Pixel 10 ProGoogle Tensor G5, DXT-48-1536, 16384
478 Points Average Google Tensor G5 (428 - 478, n=3)
459 Points -4% Half Precision NPU 1.7Average of class Smartphone (80 - 36297, n=111, last 2 years)
2630 Points +190%Average Google Tensor G5 (907 - 1032, n=3)
972 Points +7%Google Pixel 10 ProGoogle Tensor G5, DXT-48-1536, 16384
907 Points Quantized NPU 1.7Average of class Smartphone (124 - 49889, n=111, last 2 years)
3945 Points +4%Average Google Tensor G5 (3579 - 4393, n=3)
3921 Points +3%Google Pixel 10 ProGoogle Tensor G5, DXT-48-1536, 16384
3792 Points AI Benchmark
Score V5Average of class Smartphone (46.4 - 3334, n=30, last 2 years)
592 Points 0%Google Pixel 10 ProGoogle Tensor G5, DXT-48-1536, 16384
590 Points Average Google Tensor G5 (n=1)
590 Points 0%Honor Magic7 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
248 Points -58%Huawei Mate X6HiSilicon Kirin 9020, Maleoon 920, 12288
159 Points -73% Score V6Samsung Galaxy S25Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
12223 Points +1434%Honor Magic7 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
10742 Points +1248%Average of class Smartphone (55.6 - 22780, n=81, last 2 years)
5737 Points +620%Xiaomi 15Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
991 Points +24%Google Pixel 10 ProGoogle Tensor G5, DXT-48-1536, 16384
797 Points Average Google Tensor G5 (761 - 802, n=3)
787 Points -1%Huawei Mate X6HiSilicon Kirin 9020, Maleoon 920, 12288
421 Points -47%
Pixel 10 Pro 在图形性能方面也没有重大飞跃，仅比 像素 9 Pro.集成 img dxt-48-1536不具备光线追踪功能。
3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score | Steel Nomad Light Score GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen 3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy S25Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6932 Points +114%Honor Magic7 ProAdreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5933 Points +84%Xiaomi 15Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5845 Points +81%Apple iPhone 16 ProA18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 128 GB NVMe
3987 Points +23%Google Pixel 10 ProDXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3232 Points Google Pixel 9 ProMali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2605 Points -19%Google Pixel 8 ProMali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2410 Points -25%3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Samsung Galaxy S25Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6854 Points +109%Xiaomi 15Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5995 Points +83%Honor Magic7 ProAdreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5800 Points +77%Apple iPhone 16 ProA18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 128 GB NVMe
4628 Points +41%Google Pixel 10 ProDXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3281 Points Google Pixel 9 ProMali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2547 Points -22%Google Pixel 8 ProMali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2422 Points -26%3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy S25Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
27327 Points +107%Xiaomi 15Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
24960 Points +89%Honor Magic7 ProAdreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
23837 Points +81%Apple iPhone 16 ProA18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 128 GB NVMe
17967 Points +36%Google Pixel 10 ProDXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
13193 Points Google Pixel 9 ProMali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
9476 Points -28%Google Pixel 8 ProMali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8922 Points -32%3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score
Xiaomi 15Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2258 Points +123%Honor Magic7 ProAdreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2248 Points +122%Apple iPhone 16 ProA18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 128 GB NVMe
1647 Points +63%Google Pixel 9 ProMali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1026 Points +1%Google Pixel 10 ProDXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1013 Points 3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score
Xiaomi 15Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2362 Points +133%Honor Magic7 ProAdreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2272 Points +124%Apple iPhone 16 ProA18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 128 GB NVMe
1806 Points +78%Google Pixel 10 ProDXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1014 Points Google Pixel 9 ProMali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1001 Points -1%Samsung Galaxy S25Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
Points -100%GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Google Pixel 10 ProDXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
121 fps Google Pixel 8 ProMali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps -1%Google Pixel 9 ProMali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps -1%Xiaomi 15Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps -1%Samsung Galaxy S25Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps -1%Honor Magic7 ProAdreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps -1%Apple iPhone 16 ProA18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 128 GB NVMe
58 fps -52%GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Xiaomi 15Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
718 fps +77%Samsung Galaxy S25Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
711 fps +75%Honor Magic7 ProAdreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
631 fps +55%Apple iPhone 16 ProA18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 128 GB NVMe
518 fps +28%Google Pixel 9 ProMali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
415 fps +2%Google Pixel 10 ProDXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
406 fps Google Pixel 8 ProMali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
348 fps -14%GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Google Pixel 10 ProDXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
121 fps Google Pixel 8 ProMali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps -1%Xiaomi 15Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps -1%Samsung Galaxy S25Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps -1%Honor Magic7 ProAdreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps -1%Google Pixel 9 ProMali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
119 fps -2%Apple iPhone 16 ProA18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 128 GB NVMe
58.5 fps -52%GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
502 fps +78%Xiaomi 15Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
423 fps +50%Honor Magic7 ProAdreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
368 fps +30%Apple iPhone 16 ProA18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 128 GB NVMe
300 fps +6%Google Pixel 10 ProDXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
282 fps Google Pixel 9 ProMali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
245 fps -13%Google Pixel 8 ProMali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
174 fps -38%GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Xiaomi 15Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +1%Samsung Galaxy S25Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +1%Honor Magic7 ProAdreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +1%Google Pixel 10 ProDXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
119 fps Google Pixel 8 ProMali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
115 fps -3%Google Pixel 9 ProMali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
104 fps -13%Apple iPhone 16 ProA18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 128 GB NVMe
59.6 fps -50%GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Xiaomi 15Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
308 fps +49%Honor Magic7 ProAdreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
294 fps +42%Samsung Galaxy S25Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
268 fps +29%Apple iPhone 16 ProA18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 128 GB NVMe
237.3 fps +15%Google Pixel 10 ProDXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
207 fps Google Pixel 9 ProMali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
165 fps -20%Google Pixel 8 ProMali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
112 fps -46%GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Xiaomi 15Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +103%Samsung Galaxy S25Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +103%Honor Magic7 ProAdreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
114 fps +93%Google Pixel 8 ProMali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
71 fps +20%Apple iPhone 16 ProA18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 128 GB NVMe
59.9 fps +2%Google Pixel 10 ProDXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
59 fps Google Pixel 9 ProMali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
54 fps -8%GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
211 fps +160%Xiaomi 15Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
192 fps +137%Honor Magic7 ProAdreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
166 fps +105%Apple iPhone 16 ProA18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 128 GB NVMe
154.7 fps +91%Google Pixel 9 ProMali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
85 fps +5%Google Pixel 10 ProDXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
81 fps Google Pixel 8 ProMali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
75 fps -7%GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +88%Xiaomi 15Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
115 fps +80%Honor Magic7 ProAdreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
102 fps +59%Google Pixel 10 ProDXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
64 fps Google Pixel 8 ProMali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
63 fps -2%Apple iPhone 16 ProA18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 128 GB NVMe
59.5 fps -7%Google Pixel 9 ProMali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
47 fps -27%GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
118 fps +115%Xiaomi 15Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
100 fps +82%Honor Magic7 ProAdreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
90 fps +64%Apple iPhone 16 ProA18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 128 GB NVMe
69.3 fps +26%Google Pixel 10 ProDXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
55 fps Google Pixel 9 ProMali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
44 fps -20%Google Pixel 8 ProMali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
37 fps -33%GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi 15Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +28%Samsung Galaxy S25Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +28%Honor Magic7 ProAdreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +28%Google Pixel 10 ProDXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
94 fps Google Pixel 8 ProMali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
91 fps -3%Google Pixel 9 ProMali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
77 fps -18%Apple iPhone 16 ProA18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 128 GB NVMe
59.8 fps -36%GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
279 fps +120%Xiaomi 15Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
274 fps +116%Honor Magic7 ProAdreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
257 fps +102%Apple iPhone 16 ProA18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 128 GB NVMe
176.1 fps +39%Google Pixel 10 ProDXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
127 fps Google Pixel 9 ProMali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
119 fps -6%Google Pixel 8 ProMali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
98 fps -23%GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
52 fps +108%Xiaomi 15Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
47 fps +88%Honor Magic7 ProAdreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
44 fps +76%Apple iPhone 16 ProA18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 128 GB NVMe
29.6 fps +18%Google Pixel 10 ProDXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
25 fps Google Pixel 9 ProMali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
20 fps -20%Google Pixel 8 ProMali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
16 fps -36%
Pixel 10 Pro 浏览网页的速度非常快，但在基准测试中通常落后于竞争对手。
Jetstream 2 | Speedometer 2.0 | Speedometer 3 | WebXPRT 4 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1 Jetstream 2 - 2.0 Total
Apple iPhone 16 Pro (Safari 18)
386.723 Points +100%Honor Magic7 Pro (Chrome 131)
284.674 Points +47%Samsung Galaxy S25 (Chrome 134)
235.734 Points +22%Average Google Tensor G5 (193.3 - 262, n=3)
219 Points +13%Google Pixel 10 Pro (Chrome 140)
193.311 Points Xiaomi 15 (Chrome 131.0.6778.104)
191.986 Points -1%Average of class Smartphone (59.7 - 423, n=130, last 2 years)
158.3 Points -18%Speedometer 2.0 - Result 2.0
Apple iPhone 16 Pro (Safari 18)
569 runs/min +65%Samsung Galaxy S25 (Chrome 134)
435 runs/min +26%Honor Magic7 Pro (Chrome 131)
419 runs/min +21%Average Google Tensor G5 (343 - 370, n=3)
353 runs/min +2%Google Pixel 10 Pro (Chrome 140)
345 runs/min Xiaomi 15 (Chrome 131.0.6778.104)
342 runs/min -1%Average of class Smartphone (49.3 - 733, n=93, last 2 years)
244 runs/min -29%Speedometer 3 - Score 3.0
Apple iPhone 16 Pro (Safari 18)
33.5 runs/min +63%Samsung Galaxy S25 (Chrome 134)
29.9 runs/min +45%Honor Magic7 Pro (Chrome 131)
26.1 runs/min +27%Xiaomi 15 (Chrome 131.0.6778.104)
23.5 runs/min +14%Average Google Tensor G5 (20.6 - 21.3, n=3)
20.8 runs/min +1%Google Pixel 10 Pro (Chrome 140)
20.6 runs/min Average of class Smartphone (3.06 - 45.5, n=105, last 2 years)
15.1 runs/min -27%WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Apple iPhone 16 Pro (Safari 18)
267 Points +51%Samsung Galaxy S25 (Chrome 134)
244 Points +38%Honor Magic7 Pro (Chrome 131)
196 Points +11%Average Google Tensor G5 (174 - 187, n=3)
179.3 Points +1%Google Pixel 10 Pro (Chrome 140)
177 Points Xiaomi 15 (Chrome 131.0.6778.104)
168 Points -5%Average of class Smartphone (56 - 306, n=115, last 2 years)
140.6 Points -21%Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 16 Pro (Safari 18)
98997 Points +18%Samsung Galaxy S25 (Chrome 134)
95809 Points +14%Honor Magic7 Pro (Chrome 131)
89248 Points +6%Google Pixel 10 Pro (Chrome 140)
84055 Points Average Google Tensor G5 (74722 - 84281, n=3)
81019 Points -4%Xiaomi 15 (Chrome 131.0.6778.104)
78653 Points -6%Average of class Smartphone (2800 - 126661, n=160, last 2 years)
51493 Points -39%Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Smartphone (257 - 28190, n=138, last 2 years)
1075 ms * -128%Google Pixel 10 Pro (Chrome 140)
472.5 ms * Average Google Tensor G5 (468 - 473, n=3)
470 ms * +1%Xiaomi 15 (Chrome 131.0.6778.104)
454.4 ms * +4%Honor Magic7 Pro (Chrome 131)
429.4 ms * +9%Samsung Galaxy S25 (Chrome 134)
389.3 ms * +18%Apple iPhone 16 Pro (Safari 18)
276.9 ms * +41%* ... smaller is better
今年，谷歌继续使用 UFS 3.1 存储系统，不仅是 128 GB 版本，还有这里测试的 256 GB 版本。竞争对手的速度要快得多，因为他们使用 UFS 4.0 甚至 UFS 4.1 已经有一段时间了。
Google Pixel 10 ProSamsung Galaxy S25Xiaomi 15Honor Magic7 ProGoogle Pixel 9 ProAverage 256 GB UFS 4.0 FlashAverage of class SmartphoneAndroBench 3-541%92%86%-27%74%29% Sequential Read 256KB (MB/s)1492.743982.43 167%3934.92 164%3910.81 162%1717.9 15%3631 ?(1493 - 4384, n=54) 143%2258 ?(270 - 4370, n=188, last 2 years) 51% Sequential Write 256KB (MB/s)1353.552256.71 67%3889.06 187%3683.81 172%253.53 -81%2660 ?(555 - 3484, n=54) 97%1938 ?(103.2 - 4113, n=188, last 2 years) 43% Random Read 4KB (MB/s)264.44299.89 13%296.95 12%282.34 7%218.41 -17%383 ?(218 - 513, n=54) 45%310 ?(47.6 - 614, n=188, last 2 years) 17% Random Write 4KB (MB/s)347.8451.76 -85%360.36 4%357.04 3%261.55 -25%391 ?(50.7 - 989, n=54) 12%363 ?(13.1 - 1071, n=188, last 2 years) 4%
游戏快速出汗谷歌 Pixel 10 Pro 的 SoC 并不弱，但它肯定不适合游戏玩家。这首先是因为它不支持光线追踪，而且我们用GameBench 测试的帧率也不符合我们对高端智能手机的期望。测试，其帧率并不符合我们对高端智能手机的预期。
在《PUBG Mobile》中最多只能选择 HDR 设置，即使是较低的高清设置也只能达到 40 帧/秒。即使是最低画质模式，也无法以 60 帧/秒的速度持续运行。
在《源氏冲击》等要求较高的游戏中，我们可以看到帧率会随着时间的推移而下降，远远低于 60 fps 的目标值。在游戏过程中，智能手机还会发热。
PUBG Mobile
源泉冲击
Google Pixel 10 Pro; Genshin Impact; lowest 120 fps: Ø57.9 (36-61) fpsGoogle Pixel 10 Pro; Genshin Impact; highest 120 fps; 6.0.0_36598533_36939763: Ø39.1 (27-61) fpsGoogle Pixel 10 Pro; PUBG Mobile; Smooth: Ø53.3 (35-60) fpsGoogle Pixel 10 Pro; PUBG Mobile; HD: Ø39.6 (12-42) fpsGoogle Pixel 10 Pro; Diablo Immortal: Ø56 (20-61) fps
排放物 - 配备 Auracast 的 Pixel 手机温度Pixel 10 Pro 的表面温度始终保持在安全范围内，即使在持续负载的情况下也不会超过 42 °C。
谷歌对 SoC 的散热做得很好，因为在压力测试中节流很小。
但即使是节流更高的骁龙 8 精英版，其产生的帧数也比谷歌手机多 40%。
Max. LoadIdle
40.9 °C41.2 °C38.7 °C 40.5 °C41.1 °C37.2 °C 40.8 °C40.9 °C36.3 °C
Maximum: 41.2 °CAverage: 39.7 °C
37.3 °C38.1 °C39.4 °C36.4 °C39.7 °C39.4 °C35.8 °C38.4 °C38.3 °C
Maximum: 39.7 °CAverage: 38.1 °C Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260Max. LoadIdle
26.5 °C26.6 °C27.1 °C 26.2 °C26.3 °C26.8 °C 25.4 °C24.8 °C25.8 °C
Maximum: 27.1 °CAverage: 26.2 °C
25.7 °C25.8 °C25.7 °C25.5 °C26.1 °C25.5 °C25.1 °C25.8 °C25.3 °C
Maximum: 26.1 °CAverage: 25.6 °C Room Temperature 22 °C | Voltcraft IR-260(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 39.7 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.2 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 21.9 to 247 °C for the class Smartphone.(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.7 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.2 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
3DMark 压力测试
3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test StabilityApple iPhone 16 ProA18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 128 GB NVMe
92.5 % +14%Google Pixel 10 ProDXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
81.2 % Xiaomi 15Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
66.3 % -18%Honor Magic7 ProAdreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
57.6 % -29%Samsung Galaxy S25Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
52.7 % -35% Wild Life Extreme Stress TestGoogle Pixel 10 ProDXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
88.7 % Xiaomi 15Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
68.7 % -23%Apple iPhone 16 ProA18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 128 GB NVMe
60.9 % -31%Samsung Galaxy S25Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
47.5 % -46% Steel Nomad Light Stress Test StabilityGoogle Pixel 10 ProDXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
97.3 % Xiaomi 15Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
69.5 % -29%Honor Magic7 ProAdreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
68.4 % -30%Apple iPhone 16 ProA18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 128 GB NVMe
62.9 % -35%
Google Pixel 10 Pro DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.14.1: Ø18 (17.1-19.3) %Xiaomi 15 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø29 (26.2-38.2) %Google Pixel 10 Pro DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø64.8 (61.7-76) %Xiaomi 15 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø101.2 (87.7-132.2) %Google Pixel 10 Pro DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø70.9 (64.9-78.5) %Xiaomi 15 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø117.4 (98.5-139.4) %Google Pixel 10 Pro DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.1: Ø7.49 (7.38-7.59) %Xiaomi 15 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø13.8 (12.2-17.6) %
压力测试返回顶部
压力测试：底部扬声器谷歌 Pixel 10 Pro 的双扬声器输出效果不错，但音量大时听起来有点刺耳。
谷歌在蓝牙音频编解码方面并不透明，不再允许读取编解码。
至少，Auracast 是板载的，音频信号也可以通过 USB 端口输出。
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)Google Pixel 10 Pro audio analysis(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.3 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.4% lower than median(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.4% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(±) | higher highs - on average 5% higher than median(+) | highs are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.1% difference to median)Compared to same class» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 90% worse» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 34%, worst was 134%Compared to all devices tested» 26% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 69% worse» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy S25 audio analysis(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.7 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24% lower than median(+) | bass is linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(±) | reduced mids - on average 7.1% lower than median(+) | mids are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(+) | balanced highs - only 4.1% away from median(+) | highs are linear (2% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.3% difference to median)Compared to same class» 12% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 80% worse» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 34%, worst was 134%Compared to all devices tested» 32% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 59% worse» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
电池寿命：谷歌 Pixel 10 Pro 电池容量为 4,870 毫安时能源消耗闲置时，谷歌 Pixel 10 Pro 的功耗应该会低一些。不过，在负载情况下，智能手机的耗电量会更高。
Pixel 既可以使用数据线充电，也可以不使用数据线充电。使用 Qi 2.2 无线充电功率可达 15 W，使用数据线充电功率可达 30 W。在测试中，使用数据线充满电需要 86 分钟（50%：28 分钟；80%：51 分钟）。
Power Consumption
Off / Standby 0.15 / 0.23 WattIdle 1.01 / 1.65 / 2.05 Watt
Load
7.25 / 19.78 Watt
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy
Google Pixel 10 Pro4870 mAhSamsung Galaxy S254000 mAhApple iPhone 16 Pro3582 mAhXiaomi 155400 mAhHonor Magic7 Pro5270 mAhAverage Google Tensor G5 Average of class Smartphone Power Consumption14%30%32%6%13%19%Idle Minimum * (Watt)1.010.47 53%0.4 60%0.5 50%0.94 7%0.957 ?(0.88 - 1.01, n=3) 5%0.873 ?(0.39 - 1.7, n=142, last 2 years) 14%Idle Average * (Watt)1.651.04 37%0.6 64%1.11 33%1.5 9%1.427 ?(1.29 - 1.65, n=3) 14%1.464 ?(0.7 - 4.36, n=142, last 2 years) 11%Idle Maximum * (Watt)2.051.07 48%1 51%1.13 45%1.57 23%1.65 ?(1.4 - 2.05, n=3) 20%1.652 ?(0.75 - 4.46, n=142, last 2 years) 19%Load Average * (Watt)7.2513.33 -84%11 -52%8.91 -23%11.03 -52%5.67 ?(4.38 - 7.25, n=3) 22%6.78 ?(2.9 - 14.9, n=111, last 2 years) 6%Load Maximum * (Watt)19.7816.38 17%14.4 27%9.3 53%11.68 41%18.5 ?(16.3 - 19.8, n=3) 6%11.3 ?(4.75 - 22, n=111, last 2 years) 43%* ... smaller is better
功耗：Geekbench (150 cd/m²)
Google Pixel 10 Pro Google Tensor G5; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø6.37 (0.969-15.4) WattSamsung Galaxy S25 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø7.3 (0.661-16.4) WattGoogle Pixel 10 Pro Google Tensor G5; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.865 (0.78-1.11) WattSamsung Galaxy S25 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.697 (0.648-0.956) Watt
功耗：GFXbench (150 cd/m²)
Google Pixel 10 Pro Google Tensor G5; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø10.2 (8.75-11.7) WattSamsung Galaxy S25 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø14.1 (9.13-16.2) WattGoogle Pixel 10 Pro Google Tensor G5; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.865 (0.78-1.11) WattSamsung Galaxy S25 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.697 (0.648-0.956) Watt
电池寿命在测试中，电池的运行时间令人印象深刻，Pixel 10 Pro 的续航时间很长，甚至可以持续一整天。不过，从竞争对手的情况来看，更长的续航时间是有可能实现的，这通常需要使用更大的电池。
Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
33h 05min
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 140)
21h 06min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
23h 59min
Load (maximum brightness)
3h 15min
Google Pixel 10 Pro4870 mAhSamsung Galaxy S254000 mAhApple iPhone 16 Pro3582 mAhXiaomi 155400 mAhHonor Magic7 Pro5270 mAhBattery runtime6%16%46%20%Reader / Idle (h)33.145.2 37%55.3 67%62.7 89%42.1 27%H.264 (h)2426.5 10%26.4 10%29.7 24%30.1 25%WiFi v1.3 (h)21.118 -15%16.4 -22%22.8 8%24.7 17%Load (h)3.33 -9%3.6 9%5.4 64%3.6 9%
Notebookcheck 对谷歌 Pixel 10 Pro 的总体印象谷歌推出的 Pixel 10 Pro 是一款紧凑型旗舰智能手机，拥有出色的摄像头、足够的续航能力和七年的更新。不过，对于这个价格，我们更希望它能提供更多的原始性能。
Back to the verdict
Google Pixel 10 Pro
- 09/30/2025 v8
Daniel Schmidt
Chassis91%
Keyboard67 / 75 → 89%
Pointing Device96%
Connectivity69 / 69 → 100%
Weight88%
Battery92%
Display93%
Games Performance42 / 55 → 75%
Application Performance74 / 85 → 87%
AI Performance49%
Temperature90%
Noise100%
Audio78 / 90 → 87%
Camera86%
Average82%
89%
Smartphone - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions84.7%Materials60%Packaging100%Power Use94.8%Repairability76%Software Updates100% Total Sustainability Score: 85.9%
潜在竞争对手比较
ImageModel / ReviewPriceWeightDriveDisplay
1.88.9%Google Pixel 10 ProGoogle Tensor G5 ⎘ IMG DXT-48-1536 ⎘16 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 4.xAmazon: List Price: 1199€207 g256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.30"2856x1280497 PPIOLED
2.88.9%Samsung Galaxy S25Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘12 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 4.xAmazon: List Price: 899€162 g256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.20"2340x1080416 PPIAMOLED
3.87.9%Apple iPhone 16 ProApple A18 Pro ⎘ Apple A18 Pro GPU ⎘8 GB Memory, 128 GB NVMeAmazon: List Price: 1200 Euro199 g128 GB NVMe6.30"2622x1206460 PPISuper Retina XDR OLED
4.88.4%Xiaomi 15Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘12 GB Memory, 512 GB UFS 4.xAmazon: List Price: 760€191 g512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.36"2670x1200460 PPIOLED
5.89.2%Honor Magic7 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘12 GB Memory, 512 GB UFS 4.xAmazon: $990.00List Price: 1300€223 g512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.80"2800x1280453 PPIOLED
More articles related to this deviceGoogle Pixel 10 Pro (Pixel 10 Series)News•谷歌 Pixel 仍存在 3 月份引入的启动循环错误 |Review•谷歌 Pixel 10 智能手机评测：六个月后的Android 仍是一款出色的紧凑型产品，但也有一些不足之处 |News•据用户称，谷歌 Pixel 10 Pro (XL) 上的 LED 手电筒可能会导致灼伤 |News•谷歌 Pixel 智能手机在三月更新后卡在锁屏上 |News•谷歌 Pixel 10a 在 DxOMark 相机分析中赶不上 Pixel 8a 和Apple iPhone 15 |News•谷歌 Pixel 10a 出现在疑似官方图片中，有两项设计升级 |News•谷歌 Pixel 10（Pro）用户抱怨最近更新后出现大量问题 |News•Android 16 QPR3 Beta 1 为 Pixel 10 带来新功能、用户界面调整和 GPU 驱动程序更新 |News•Pixel 10 Pro 折叠机在耐久性测试中爆炸，而且不防尘：谷歌没有吸取教训 |News•谷歌 Pixel 10（Pro）用户抱怨十月更新后应用程序崩溃 |News•谷歌 Pixel 10 Pro (XL) 官方维修配件现已上市，部分比 Pixel 9 Pro 便宜 |News•谷歌 Pixel 10 Pro：专业分辨率变焦效果如何？ |News•谷歌 Pixel 10 Pro：相机教练能提供什么？ |News•Pixel 10 Pro：功能强大的智能手机，引擎却很弱 |Review•谷歌 Pixel 10 Pro XL 智能手机评测：华丽旗舰，提供出色的Android 体验，但有一个致命弱点 |News•谷歌 Pixel 10 Pro XL：拆解专家对可修复的内部结构和维修指南印象深刻 |News•谷歌 Pixel 10 在 iFixit 拆解中显示出明显的维修改进 |News•谷歌 Pixel Feature Drop 为 Pixel 6 及更新机型添加了 Material 3 Expressive 和新功能 ...Related Articles
谷歌 Pixel 10 智能手机评测：六个月后的Android 仍是一款出色的紧凑型产品，但也有一些不足之处
04/09/2026
TransparencyThe selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was freely purchased by the author at his/her own expense. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
Add as a preferred source on Google
Editor of the original article: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 786472 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008contact me via: